Describe the syncretic evolution of religious practices in Arunachal Pradesh, citing specific examples of indigenous beliefs influencing mainstream Indian religions.

Describe the syncretic evolution of religious practices in Arunachal Pradesh, citing specific examples of indigenous beliefs influencing mainstream Indian religions.

Paper: paper_2
Topic: Indian Heritage and Culture

Syncretism: Blending of different religious beliefs and practices.

Arunachal Pradesh: Region with diverse indigenous tribal communities and historical exposure to mainstream Indian religions (Hinduism, Buddhism).

Indigenous Beliefs: Animism, ancestor worship, nature worship, shamanism.

Mainstream Religions: Hinduism, Buddhism (especially Vajrayana/Tibetan Buddhism).

Examples: Specific deities, rituals, festivals, practices showing blending.

Influence: How indigenous elements altered or were integrated into existing religious frameworks.

Continuity: How older beliefs persist alongside newer ones.

Religious Syncretism: The fusion of diverse religious elements.

Cultural Diffusion: The spread of cultural traits from one group to another.

Indigenization: The process by which foreign cultural elements are adapted to local circumstances.

Pluralism: The coexistence of multiple religious traditions.

Tribal Religions: Indigenous spiritual systems often tied to nature and ancestral spirits.

Vajrayana Buddhism: A form of Buddhism prevalent in Arunachal Pradesh.

Hinduism: The dominant religion of India, with various traditions.

Arunachal Pradesh, situated in the northeasternmost part of India, is a region characterized by its immense cultural diversity, home to numerous indigenous tribal communities. Historically, these communities possessed rich and distinct indigenous belief systems, often rooted in animism, ancestor worship, and nature veneration. With the gradual ingress of mainstream Indian religions like Hinduism and Buddhism, a fascinating process of syncretism began, wherein indigenous beliefs and practices either influenced the adopted religions or were themselves absorbed and reinterpreted within these new frameworks. This evolution has resulted in a unique religious landscape where distinct spiritual traditions coexist and intermingle, creating a syncretic tapestry.

The syncretic evolution of religious practices in Arunachal Pradesh is a testament to the dynamic interplay between indigenous spiritualities and external religious influences. The indigenous populations, prior to the widespread adoption of Hinduism and Buddhism, largely adhered to animistic beliefs. These encompassed the worship of nature spirits inhabiting mountains, rivers, forests, and celestial bodies, as well as the veneration of ancestors believed to influence the well-being of the living. Shamans, or spirit mediums, played a crucial role in mediating between the human and spirit worlds, performing rituals for healing, protection, and agricultural prosperity.

With the expansion of Buddhist influence, particularly from Tibet and Bhutan, many Monpa, Sherdukpen, and other communities in the western districts of Arunachal Pradesh embraced Vajrayana Buddhism. However, this adoption was not a complete abandonment of their ancestral beliefs. Instead, a significant syncretism occurred. For instance, local deities and nature spirits were often identified with Buddhist protective deities or incorporated into the Buddhist pantheon as local manifestations. The reverence for mountains, a core element of indigenous beliefs, continued, with prominent peaks being associated with Buddhist lamas or Buddhist deities. Rituals performed by Buddhist monks often incorporated elements or prayers for appeasing local spirits, a practice that reflects the persistence of the earlier worldview.

Similarly, while Hinduism’s presence is more recent in some areas, and less pervasive than Buddhism in the western districts, there are instances of syncretism, particularly in the eastern and southern parts of the state where communities like the Adi, Idu Mishmi, and Tangsa have had interactions with Hindu traditions. In some Ahom-influenced areas, local deities might be equated with Hindu gods or goddesses, and certain festivals may see the incorporation of Hindu rituals or deities alongside traditional practices. For example, the worship of ancestral spirits, a strong indigenous tradition, sometimes gets integrated with the veneration of household deities that have Hindu connotations, or the rituals might adopt sanskritized names for traditional offerings.

A notable example of indigenous influence on mainstream practices can be seen in the way certain festivals are celebrated. While major Buddhist festivals like Losar are observed, they often retain local flavors and incorporate elements that acknowledge and appease the local landscape spirits or ensure the continuation of traditional agricultural cycles, which are intrinsically linked to indigenous animistic beliefs. Similarly, the shamanic practices, though potentially marginalized by formal religious structures, continue to hold sway in many rural areas, with shamans sometimes functioning alongside or in parallel to religious authorities from the adopted religions, blurring the lines of formal religious affiliation.

The concept of spirits residing in natural elements remains a powerful undercurrent. Even in communities that predominantly follow Buddhism, there can be a continued belief in the potency of certain sacred groves or mountain spirits, and rituals might be performed to ensure their favor, demonstrating a nuanced acceptance of multiple spiritual realities rather than a wholesale conversion. The respect for elders and ancestors, a universal indigenous trait, is also often harmonized with the Buddhist emphasis on karma and rebirth, creating a moral framework that draws from both traditions.

In conclusion, the religious landscape of Arunachal Pradesh is a vibrant illustration of syncretism. Indigenous animistic and ancestor-worshipping traditions have not merely been replaced by Hinduism and Buddhism but have actively shaped and been shaped by them. The incorporation of local deities into Buddhist pantheons, the continued reverence for nature spirits alongside formal religious observances, and the adaptation of mainstream rituals to local cultural contexts are all indicative of this ongoing syncretic evolution. This process highlights the adaptive nature of human spirituality and the ability of communities to integrate new beliefs while preserving and reinterpreting their ancient heritage, resulting in a unique and resilient religious identity for the people of Arunachal Pradesh.

Evaluate corporate governance effectiveness in Arunachal Pradesh PSUs; judge strengths/weaknesses with evidence.

Evaluate corporate governance effectiveness in Arunachal Pradesh PSUs; judge strengths/weaknesses with evidence.

Paper: paper_5
Topic: Corporate governance

For evaluating corporate governance effectiveness in Arunachal Pradesh PSUs:

  • Focus on both quantitative (financial performance, audit reports, compliance metrics) and qualitative (board composition, transparency, stakeholder engagement) evidence.
  • Identify specific Arunachal Pradesh PSU case studies for concrete examples.
  • Consider the unique socio-economic and political context of Arunachal Pradesh, including its remoteness, tribal governance structures, and state government’s role.
  • Address the “strengths” and “weaknesses” directly, providing evidence for each.
  • Acknowledge the role of regulatory bodies and legislative frameworks.
  • Discuss the impact of governance on PSU performance and public trust.

Major concepts involved in evaluating corporate governance effectiveness in Arunachal Pradesh PSUs include:

  • Corporate Governance Principles: Accountability, Transparency, Fairness, Responsibility.
  • Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs): Their mandate, objectives, and governance structures.
  • Arunachal Pradesh Context: Unique geographical, socio-economic, political, and cultural factors influencing governance.
  • Board Effectiveness: Composition, independence, roles, responsibilities, and decision-making processes.
  • Financial Oversight: Audit mechanisms, internal controls, financial reporting, and accountability for funds.
  • Stakeholder Engagement: Responsibilities towards employees, citizens, government, and other stakeholders.
  • Regulatory Framework: Relevant laws, policies, and guidelines governing PSUs in India and specifically in Arunachal Pradesh.
  • Transparency and Disclosure: Access to information, reporting practices, and communication strategies.
  • Ethical Conduct: Anti-corruption measures, conflict of interest policies, and code of conduct.
  • Performance Measurement: Linking governance to operational efficiency, service delivery, and achievement of PSU objectives.

Evaluating the effectiveness of corporate governance in Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) within Arunachal Pradesh requires a nuanced approach, considering the unique socio-economic and administrative landscape of the region. Arunachal Pradesh, with its vast geographical expanse, diverse tribal populations, and developmental priorities, presents a distinct context for PSU operations and governance. This evaluation will delve into the strengths and weaknesses of corporate governance practices in these PSUs, supported by specific evidence and drawing upon established governance principles and regulatory frameworks, to provide a comprehensive judgment on their effectiveness.

The effectiveness of corporate governance in Arunachal Pradesh PSUs can be assessed through various lenses, examining their adherence to established principles and their impact on operational outcomes. Several strengths are evident, often stemming from the inherent nature of PSUs and specific regional initiatives.

Strengths:

  • Mandate for Public Service: A core strength is the statutory mandate of most PSUs to serve the public interest and contribute to the socio-economic development of Arunachal Pradesh. For instance, PSUs involved in power distribution (e.g., Arunachal Pradesh State Electricity Board, now APDCL) or public transport (e.g., Arunachal Pradesh State Transport Service) are designed to provide essential services, often in remote and underserved areas, which is a direct positive outcome of their governance structure aimed at public welfare.
  • Government Oversight and Accountability: As state-owned entities, PSUs in Arunachal Pradesh are subject to significant oversight from the State Government, legislative assembly, and audit bodies like the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG). CAG audit reports, widely available for public sector entities, often highlight compliance with financial rules and regulations, indicating a baseline level of accountability for resource utilization. For example, reports on the utilization of funds by state PSUs for infrastructure projects or welfare schemes serve as evidence of this oversight.
  • Formalized Governance Structures: PSUs typically operate with formally constituted Boards of Directors, often with representation from government departments. This structure, in principle, ensures adherence to established decision-making processes and provides a platform for strategic direction, which can contribute to stability and organized functioning. The presence of these boards, even if facing challenges, signifies an intention to implement structured governance.
  • Focus on Social Objectives: Many Arunachal Pradesh PSUs are tasked with social objectives beyond mere profit, such as employment generation in remote areas or the provision of subsidized services. The governance framework, by its design, encourages the pursuit of these developmental goals, which is a key strength in a state striving for balanced growth.

Weaknesses:

  • Board Independence and Expertise: A recurring weakness observed in many state-level PSUs, including those in Arunachal Pradesh, is the lack of genuine board independence and sufficient domain expertise. Board appointments may be influenced by political considerations rather than merit, leading to a dilution of independent decision-making and a potential lack of specialized knowledge in areas like technology, finance, or market dynamics. Evidence for this can be found in anecdotal accounts and analyses of board composition in state government reports or investigative journalism.
  • Operational Inefficiencies and Financial Performance: Many Arunachal Pradesh PSUs suffer from significant operational inefficiencies, leading to financial losses and reliance on state subsidies. This can be attributed to factors such as outdated technology, bureaucratic hurdles, and a lack of performance-driven culture, which are symptomatic of governance failures. For instance, consistently negative financial results or accumulated losses reported by entities like the Arunachal Pradesh Industrial Development Corporation (APIDC) in its earlier phases, before restructuring, would be indicative of governance weaknesses affecting performance.
  • Transparency and Information Dissemination: While PSUs are obligated to disclose information, the level of transparency and the timeliness of information dissemination can be a concern. Access to detailed operational data, board minutes, or audit findings may be restricted, hindering public scrutiny and stakeholder engagement. The infrequent or incomplete public disclosure of annual reports by some smaller state-level PSUs can be cited as evidence.
  • Political Interference and Autonomy: A significant challenge is the potential for undue political interference in the day-to-day operations and strategic decisions of PSUs. This can undermine their autonomy, lead to non-commercial objectives overriding sound business practices, and create an environment where accountability is diffused. Reports of government directives overriding board decisions, or personnel appointments made on non-meritocratic grounds, would serve as anecdotal evidence.
  • Stakeholder Engagement Deficiencies: Effective governance requires proactive engagement with all stakeholders. In Arunachal Pradesh, particularly in remote areas, PSUs may struggle with robust stakeholder consultation processes, leading to disconnects with local communities or employee grievances. The lack of structured feedback mechanisms or grievance redressal systems can be a proxy indicator.
  • Compliance and Ethical Lapses: While CAG audits provide a degree of financial oversight, instances of financial irregularities, non-compliance with procurement procedures, or ethical lapses can occur, as highlighted in periodic audit reports. These instances, though not always widespread, point to weaknesses in internal controls and the effectiveness of the ethical framework.

The effectiveness of corporate governance in Arunachal Pradesh PSUs is therefore a mixed picture. While the intent of public service and government oversight provides a foundational strength, the practical implementation often faces challenges related to board quality, operational autonomy, transparency, and the pervasive influence of external factors, including political pressures. Addressing these weaknesses through reforms focused on professionalizing boards, enhancing operational efficiency, and strengthening transparency mechanisms is crucial for improving PSU performance and fostering public trust.

In conclusion, the evaluation of corporate governance effectiveness in Arunachal Pradesh PSUs reveals a landscape marked by inherent strengths derived from their public service mandate and government oversight, balanced against significant weaknesses stemming from issues of board independence, operational inefficiencies, transparency gaps, and potential political interference. While PSUs like the Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Recruitment Commission (though a constitutional body, it operates within a governance framework that impacts public service delivery) or utilities like APDCL strive to fulfill their public obligations, their effectiveness is often hampered by structural and operational challenges. The evidence, drawn from general patterns observed in state PSUs and referencing the critical role of audit reports, suggests that strengthening board capacity, ensuring greater operational autonomy, enhancing transparency in decision-making and financial reporting, and insulating operations from undue political influence are critical imperatives. Ultimately, robust corporate governance is not merely a matter of compliance but a strategic enabler for PSUs in Arunachal Pradesh to achieve their developmental goals and serve the citizens effectively.

Assess the significance of robust multi-modal transport infrastructure in Arunachal Pradesh for its economic and strategic development.

Assess the significance of robust multi-modal transport infrastructure in Arunachal Pradesh for its economic and strategic development.

Paper: paper_4
Topic: Infrastructure: Energy, Ports, Roads, Airports, Railways etc

Arunachal Pradesh, a strategically vital and geographically challenging state in Northeast India, possesses immense untapped economic potential. The development of robust multi-modal transport infrastructure is not merely a matter of connectivity but a foundational pillar for unlocking this potential, fostering economic growth, and bolstering national security. This assessment will delve into the multifaceted significance of such infrastructure for Arunachal Pradesh’s economic and strategic development, examining its role in trade, tourism, resource mobilization, and border management.

The significance of multi-modal transport infrastructure in Arunachal Pradesh hinges on its ability to overcome geographical barriers, facilitate economic activity, enhance connectivity for its people, and strengthen national security. Key aspects include: improving access to markets for local produce, enabling efficient movement of goods and services, attracting investment, boosting tourism, facilitating disaster response, and supporting border patrol and military logistics. The integration of various transport modes (road, rail, air, and potentially waterways) is crucial for maximizing efficiency and cost-effectiveness.

Key concepts relevant to this assessment include:

  • Multi-modal Transport: The integrated use of two or more different modes of transport (e.g., road and rail, air and road) to move passengers or freight.
  • Economic Development: Processes that increase the economic well-being and quality of life of a nation, region, or community, characterized by growth and development.
  • Strategic Development: The planning and execution of actions to achieve long-term national security objectives and geopolitical advantages.
  • Connectivity: The degree of direct or indirect linkage between places, facilitating the movement of people, goods, and information.
  • Geographical Barriers: Natural obstacles such as mountains, rivers, and dense forests that impede transportation and economic activity.
  • Logistics: The detailed coordination of a complex operation involving many people, facilities, or supplies.
  • Border Management: The activities undertaken by governments to control the movement of people, goods, and vehicles across their borders.

The significance of robust multi-modal transport infrastructure in Arunachal Pradesh can be assessed across several critical dimensions:

  • Economic Development:**
  • Market Access and Trade Facilitation: Arunachal Pradesh is rich in natural resources and agricultural produce (horticulture, medicinal plants, forest products). Improved road networks, coupled with air and potential rail connectivity, will allow for faster and more cost-effective movement of these goods to domestic and international markets. This reduces post-harvest losses and increases farmer incomes. Integrated transport systems can streamline logistics, reducing transit times and thereby enhancing the competitiveness of local products.
  • Investment Promotion: Reliable transport infrastructure is a sine qua non for attracting both domestic and foreign investment. Industries requiring raw material input or catering to wider markets are hesitant to invest in areas with poor connectivity. Multi-modal links can significantly reduce the operational costs and risks for businesses, encouraging investment in sectors like hydropower, tourism, and manufacturing.
  • Tourism Growth: Arunachal Pradesh’s stunning natural beauty and rich cultural heritage offer immense tourism potential. Developing multi-modal access, including better roads to remote tourist spots, air connectivity to key towns, and potentially cruise facilities on rivers, will make the state more accessible to tourists. This, in turn, will stimulate local economies, create employment opportunities, and generate revenue.
  • Resource Mobilization and Development: Efficient transport is crucial for the extraction and transportation of natural resources, such as minerals and timber, in a sustainable manner. Multi-modal links ensure that resources can be moved from extraction sites to processing units or markets without significant bottlenecks.
  • Employment Generation: The construction and maintenance of transport infrastructure itself creates direct employment. Furthermore, improved connectivity fosters the growth of ancillary industries and services, leading to indirect job creation across various sectors.
  • Strategic Development:**
  • National Security and Border Management: Arunachal Pradesh shares a long and sensitive border with China. Robust multi-modal transport infrastructure is vital for the Indian armed forces to effectively patrol the border, deploy troops and equipment rapidly, and ensure the security of the nation. Improved road networks and airfields allow for quick troop movement and supply chain management in difficult terrain. Integrated transport also aids in civilian population management and border area development.
  • Disaster Response and Relief: The state is prone to natural disasters like landslides and floods. Well-developed multi-modal transport networks enable faster and more efficient deployment of disaster relief teams, medical aid, and essential supplies to affected areas, saving lives and mitigating damage.
  • Integration with National Grid: Improved connectivity ensures that Arunachal Pradesh is not an isolated region but is well-integrated with the economic and developmental mainstream of the country. This fosters a sense of national unity and provides access to wider opportunities for its citizens.
  • Geopolitical Leverage: A strategically connected Arunachal Pradesh enhances India’s ability to project its influence and manage its border effectively in a region of significant geopolitical importance. It allows for quicker responses to any territorial incursions or challenges.

In conclusion, the significance of robust multi-modal transport infrastructure in Arunachal Pradesh for its economic and strategic development is profound and indispensable. It acts as a catalyst for economic diversification and growth by improving market access, attracting investment, and boosting tourism. Simultaneously, it strengthens national security by facilitating border management, rapid troop deployment, and effective disaster response. Investing in a well-integrated network of roads, railways, and air connectivity is not just an infrastructure project; it is a strategic imperative that will unlock the state’s full potential, improve the lives of its people, and secure India’s northeastern frontier for decades to come.

Critically comment: Arunachal Pradesh’s legislative-executive nexus undermines separation of powers, impacting governance efficacy.

Critically comment: Arunachal Pradesh’s legislative-executive nexus undermines separation of powers, impacting governance efficacy.

Paper: paper_3
Topic: Separation of powers between various organs

The assertion that Arunachal Pradesh’s legislative-executive nexus undermines the separation of powers, thereby impacting governance efficacy, warrants a critical examination. This complex relationship, often characterized by interdependencies and potential for overlap, is a recurring theme in democratic governance, particularly in states with unique political dynamics. While a robust separation of powers is fundamental to checks and balances and efficient governance, the practical realities in Arunachal Pradesh, as in many Indian states, often present a nuanced picture where the lines between legislative and executive functions can blur.

  • Definition of Separation of Powers: Understand Montesquieu’s doctrine and its application in India (parliamentary system, functional overlap).
  • Legislative Functions: Law-making, oversight, accountability of the executive.
  • Executive Functions: Implementation of laws, policy formulation, administration.
  • Nexus: Areas where these functions intertwine or influence each other.
  • Undermining: How this nexus can lead to concentration of power, reduced accountability, or inefficiencies.
  • Governance Efficacy: Impact on decision-making speed, policy implementation, public service delivery, and transparency.
  • Arunachal Pradesh Specifics: Consider any unique political, social, or administrative factors influencing this nexus in the state (e.g., party politics, regional influences, developmental challenges).
  • Critical Comment: Go beyond mere description to analyze the strengths, weaknesses, and consequences of this nexus, offering a balanced perspective.
  • Separation of Powers: The constitutional principle dividing governmental powers among the legislature, executive, and judiciary to prevent tyranny and ensure checks and balances.
  • Parliamentary Sovereignty (in practice): While not absolute in India, the legislature’s role in holding the executive accountable.
  • Accountability and Transparency: How the legislative-executive nexus affects these crucial governance elements.
  • Checks and Balances: The mechanisms through which each branch can limit the power of the others.
  • Governance Efficacy: The effectiveness and efficiency of the government in delivering public services and achieving developmental goals.
  • Party Politics and Coalition Dynamics: The influence of political parties and alliances on the relationship between the legislature and the executive.

The legislative-executive nexus in Arunachal Pradesh, as in most parliamentary democracies, is inherent to the system. The Council of Ministers, which forms the executive, is drawn from and accountable to the legislature (the State Legislative Assembly). This symbiotic relationship is designed to ensure that the executive acts with the confidence of the elected representatives of the people. However, critical commentary suggests that in Arunachal Pradesh, this nexus can manifest in ways that potentially undermine the spirit of separation of powers, impacting governance efficacy.

One of the primary ways this nexus can be problematic is through the concentration of power. When the ruling party or coalition commands a significant majority in the Assembly, the executive (led by the Chief Minister and Council of Ministers) often enjoys considerable sway over legislative proceedings. This can lead to a situation where the legislature’s oversight role – its ability to scrutinize and question executive actions – might be weakened. Bills can be passed with minimal debate, and executive policies might face less robust challenge, potentially leading to less effective policy formulation and implementation. For instance, instances where executive decisions are quickly ratified by the legislature without thorough deliberation could be seen as a blurring of roles, where the executive effectively dictates legislative agenda.

Furthermore, the nexus can impact governance efficacy through the politicization of administrative functions. When political considerations heavily influence executive appointments and policy decisions, the professional and impartial execution of policies can suffer. The legislature’s role in approving budgets and scrutinizing expenditures provides an avenue for oversight, but if political loyalty supersedes administrative merit, the effectiveness of public service delivery can be compromised. This is particularly relevant in a state like Arunachal Pradesh, which faces significant developmental challenges and relies heavily on government initiatives.

The fluidity of party affiliations and coalition politics in Arunachal Pradesh can also exacerbate the nexus. Frequent floor-crossing or shifting alliances can lead to a situation where the executive’s stability is dependent on managing legislative support rather than purely on policy performance. This can create an environment where legislative time and resources are diverted towards political maneuvering rather than substantive governance. The legislature’s ability to act as an independent check on the executive can be diluted if its members are primarily focused on maintaining party discipline or seeking personal political advantages derived from their executive connections.

However, it is crucial to offer a balanced critique. The same nexus that can lead to a concentration of power also facilitates decisive governance. A strong executive, backed by a supportive legislature, can implement development projects and address urgent issues more efficiently. For example, swift passage of budgets or developmental schemes can accelerate progress. The legislature’s ability to question and debate is also a vital part of the process, even if at times it appears politically charged. The presence of opposition parties, even if numerically weaker, serves as a crucial check and provides alternative perspectives. The effectiveness of this nexus is therefore not a fixed outcome but is contingent on the maturity of political institutions, the commitment to democratic norms by all stakeholders, and the vigilance of civil society.

The impact on governance efficacy can be viewed through different lenses. While a weak oversight might lead to policy drift or corruption, a strong, albeit potentially dominant, nexus might ensure faster execution of policies and a more unified approach to governance. The question is whether this efficiency comes at the cost of accountability and broad-based consensus-building. For example, if developmental funds are disbursed based on political patronage rather than need, governance efficacy in terms of equitable development is severely impacted, even if the funds are spent quickly.

In essence, the legislative-executive nexus in Arunachal Pradesh, like elsewhere, is a double-edged sword. While it provides the framework for a functioning government, its potential for imbalance can lead to a weakening of the separation of powers, creating vulnerabilities in accountability mechanisms and potentially impacting the objective and efficient delivery of governance. The critical comment lies in analyzing *how* and *to what extent* this nexus is being leveraged, potentially at the expense of constitutional principles and effective governance.

In conclusion, the legislative-executive nexus in Arunachal Pradesh, while an inherent feature of its parliamentary system, does present potential challenges to the strict adherence to the separation of powers. The capacity for the executive to exert significant influence over the legislature, coupled with the dynamics of party politics and coalition stability, can, at times, lead to a blurring of distinct roles and responsibilities. This, in turn, can impact governance efficacy by potentially diminishing legislative oversight, politicizing administrative processes, and diverting focus from substantive policy implementation towards political expediency. However, a critical assessment must also acknowledge that this nexus also enables decisive action and policy implementation. The efficacy of governance hinges on the balance struck between these competing forces, emphasizing the need for strong institutional checks, adherence to democratic norms, and active public engagement to ensure that the legislative-executive relationship serves the broader interest of effective and accountable governance in the state.

[jetpack_subscription_form title=”Subscribe to APPSC Notes” subscribe_text=”Never Miss any APPSC important update!” subscribe_button=”Sign Me Up” show_subscribers_total=”1″]